If you push the right buttons on a T2 DVD menu it'll even integrate the disowned happy-2029 ending into the film. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003) In the original Terminator it was Arnie as the T-800 being transported back in time as the bad guy. Creators want to exploit and satisfy that demand that's why the T2 Special Edition was released 26 years ago as one of the pioneering examples of choose-your-own-adventure home video interactivity.
But in terminator lore its in Los Angeles California. Showing all 75 items Jump to: Photos (54) Quotes (21) Photos 31 more photos Quotes Kyle Reese : 36:41 Come with me if you want to live. It was founded in 2004, and most likely named after the terminator movies. People want different-sized portions of these universes. Originally posted by 76561198187576418: Cyberdyne is a Japanese robotics and technology company most noted for the marketing and distribution of the HAL robotic exoskeleton suit. It may be that "transmedia storytelling" undermines strong self-contained narratives but there's demand for it because sci-fi fans overanalyze everything. The name is the same as a fictional company from the Terminator film series, which also produces robots. 2 as a venture company to develop his ideas for an exoskeleton suit. (An example of contradicted canon in Terminator is T2's infamous CPU learning switch, which stands in the special edition but is renounced in the T2 theatrical cut and in Dark Fate.) Then there was also Lucasfilm's expanded universe, which was official canon but only until future works or words of George Lucas contradicted it the non-Cameron Terminator projects now exist in a similar alternate dimension as the first Timothy Zahn Star Wars book trilogy, to be experienced, ignored, or plundered at the whims of viewer or creator. Cyberdyne was founded on June 24, 2004, by Yoshiyuki Sankai, a professor at the University of Tsukuba. Deleted scenes are also considered G-canon if they weren't contradicted by the final cut or other G-canon. I think now, given Cameron's reclaimed rights and control, the canon situtation is now logically similar to the former Lucasfilm canon rules under George Lucas: The word of God, "G-canon" was not just the films but also anything Lucas ever said or wrote about the universe in any context, sincerely and not in jest, in public or in private notes or story meetings. If we say the chain of custody for the T-800 parts is in question because it's not explicitly detailed except in cut scenes, are we saying we want a future story to make something up that's different than what Cameron intended?
Besides answering one's own questions consistent with the author's intent, the purpose of canon consensus is to prevent future stories from introducing logical inconsistencies for no good reason.